<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>compare on MaisonBisson</title>
    <link>https://maisonbisson.com/tags/compare/</link>
    <description>Recent content in compare on MaisonBisson</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 16:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://maisonbisson.com/tags/compare/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Who Makes These Decisions Anyway?</title>
      <link>https://maisonbisson.com/post/who-makes-these-decisions-anyway/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://maisonbisson.com/post/who-makes-these-decisions-anyway/</guid>
      <description>Brian’s comment at RemainingRelevant should resonate with many of us:
Something to consider about why libraries end up with bad interfaces (at least as far as catalogs go) is that it might be that the people who use the interface (and help the public use it) are not the people who decide which interface to use.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Q: Why Do Some Things Suck?</title>
      <link>https://maisonbisson.com/post/q-why-do-some-things-suck/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 20:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://maisonbisson.com/post/q-why-do-some-things-suck/</guid>
      <description>A: Because we compare them to the wrong things.
I’m in training today for a piece of software used in libraries.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Nature Concludes Wikipedia Not Bad</title>
      <link>https://maisonbisson.com/post/nature-concludes-wikipedia-not-bad/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://maisonbisson.com/post/nature-concludes-wikipedia-not-bad/</guid>
      <description>Fresh from Nature: a peer reveiw comparison of Wikipedia’s science coverage against Encyclopaedia Britannica:
One of the extraordinary stories of the Internet age is that of Wikipedia, a free online encyclopaedia that anyone can edit.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>OCLC Report: Libraries vs. Search Engines</title>
      <link>https://maisonbisson.com/post/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://maisonbisson.com/post/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines/</guid>
      <description>So, the report was released Monday, and it’s actually titled Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources (2005), but the part I’m highlighting here is the results of the question that asked users to compare their experiences with search engines against their experiences with libraries.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
