Reviewing FCC Rules on WiFi Use

I wasn’t really paying attention in June when WiFi Net News reported on a FCC decision regarding control of WiFi:

The FCC says landlords, associations can’t regulate Part 15 use: The FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology says that the function of regulating and coordinating frequency use is reserved to the FCC itself. It’s a clear refutation of mall owners, airports, and condominium associations to limit use of Wi-Fi and other wireless technologies.
And it’s hard to put their conclusion any better than they themselves:[quote]The rules prohibit homeowner associations, landlords, state and local governments, or any other third parties from placing restrictions that impair a customer antenna user’s ability to install, maintain, or use such customer antennas transmitting and/or receiving commercial nonbroadcast communications signals when the antenna is located “on property within the exclusive use or control” of the user where the user has a “direct or indirect ownership or leasehold interest in the property, except under certain exceptions for safety and historic preservation.”

So this recent report that the Tampa Airport Thinks FCC Rules Don’t Apply was a more interesting news hit than might have been expected. It seems the Tampa airport authorities have retained counsel and are planning some appeal.

There was a recent spat at the University of Texas where they first tried to prohibit WiFi, the spent some time considering the use of private WiFi, then, recognizing the June FCC ruling rescinded the WiFi ban.

This would, of course, have local implications, if anybody tried to test it.

My opinion: this FCC ruling is actually good for consumers. If the FCC left it to landowners, they’d be creating local monopolies that charge high premiums for service. Further, since the ruling effects all unlicensed services, not just WiFi, it could be creating a regulations nightmare where other non-commercial spectrum uses, like FRS, might be banned or limited. Further, the ruling is actually about the use of radio spectrum, unlike recent copyright limitations mandated by the FCC.

fcc, wifi, unlicensed spectrum, rules, spectrum, University of Texas, regulation, frequency allocation

7 thoughts on “Reviewing FCC Rules on WiFi Use

  1. Pingback: MaisonBisson.com » Blog Archive » The Fight Over Massport WiFi

  2. I am trying toget Movieland/Media Pike from sending me a payment notice every time I turn on my PC.This is just a bunch of Spsm. Please help or send me to someone who can.Thank You

  3. I keep getting a movieland payment notice when i sign on to the Internet. It says I downloaded some trial version. was not even in town on the date they say I downloaded and i have no idea how this got on my computer. They are trying to extort money from me by putting this payment notice on my computer. My son says it is a virus but I can not find anything on that either. I believe this to be unlawful.

  4. why are raidio broadcasters allow to call our eclected officals douchbads on the air air ammmerica wl1b 1190 dose it all the time as a taxpayer i want this stoped

  5. Why is words like shit, etc. bleeped out and someone using God’s name in vain isn’t???? Don’t you have it backwards??? Just goes to show that whom ever made this rule is no child of God’s. I cringe when His Precious Name used so carelessley. I don’t watch too much tv and go to movies because of God’s name used in vain. Do YOU NOT REALIZE that THIS IS A SIN???????????? PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  6. I have a complaint about the homepage network called freeze.com I did not finish installing this web because I didn’t want it. It still installed itself and now I can’t get it off of my home site. They have a contact site that says you can take it off your home page. I have tried over and over to get them to get it off and they don’t seem to listen very well. My advice is for everyone who sees this freeze.com site not to even look at it.

Comments are closed.