<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MaisonBisson.com &#187; open access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/tag/open-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maisonbisson.com</link>
	<description>A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NYT: The Link Is The Currency Of The Web</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11947/nyt-the-link-is-the-currency-of-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11947/nyt-the-link-is-the-currency-of-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Libraries & Networked Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nyt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timesselect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11947/nyt-the-link-is-the-currency-of-the-web</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The New York Times has struggled with TimesSelect, now they&#8217;re killing it. But the news here isn&#8217;t that a media giant is giving up on a much hyped online venture. The news is that a media giant is endorsing what we now call web 2.0:
Since we launched TimesSelect in 2005, the online landscape has altered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-11947"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p>The New York Times has <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11587/nyt-struggles-to-find-young-audience-online-audience-audience" title="» NYT Struggles To Find Young Audience, Online Audience, Audience">struggled with TimesSelect</a>, now they&#8217;re killing it. But the news here isn&#8217;t that a media giant is giving up on a much hyped online venture. The news is that a media giant is endorsing what we now call web 2.0:</p>
<blockquote><p>Since we launched TimesSelect in 2005, the online landscape has altered significantly. <strong>Readers increasingly find news through search, as well as through social networks, blogs and other online sources.</strong> In light of this shift, we believe offering unfettered access to New York Times reporting and analysis best serves the interest of our readers, our brand and the long-term vitality of our journalism. We encourage everyone to read our news and opinion &#8212; as well as <strong>share it, link to it and comment on it</strong>. [Emphasis added.]</p></blockquote>
<p>If only they&#8217;re realized it <a href="http://nosheep.net/story/ny-times-steps-back-5-years/">back when they started it</a>.</p>
<p><tags>web 2.0, web20, NYT, New York Times, TimesSelect, linking, open access</tags></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11947/nyt-the-link-is-the-currency-of-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Economy Vs. Libraries</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10615/the-google-economy-vs-libraries/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10615/the-google-economy-vs-libraries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 05:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Libraries & Networked Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessible resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading the way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trustworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roger over at Electric Forest is making some arguments about the value of open access to information. Hopefully he&#8217;ll forgive me for my edit of his comment (though readers check the original to make sure I preserved the original meaning):
&#8230;keep the [information] under heavy protection and you will find that people ignore this sheltered content [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-10615"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p>Roger over at <a href="http://www.altheim.com/ef/2005/06/wikipedia-and-libraries.html">Electric Forest</a> is making some arguments about the value of open access to information. Hopefully he&#8217;ll forgive me for my edit of his comment (though readers check the <a href="http://www.altheim.com/ef/2005/06/wikipedia-and-libraries.html">original</a> to make sure I preserved the original meaning):</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;keep the [information] under heavy protection and you will find that people ignore this sheltered content in favor of the sources that embrace the web and make everything accessible&#8230; [Open and accessible resources] will become the influential authorities, not because they are more trustworthy, or more authoritative, or better written, but because they are more accessible.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve been calling this the “Google Economy,” where the value of information is directly proportional to its accessibility. This is a foreign land to libraries, where isolation and division of information is the norm (just count the number of unrelated search boxes linked on your library site), but it&#8217;s something I see a few people working to overcome. Kudos to Roger and others for a lot of great work.<br />
<!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/accessibility" rel="tag">accessibility</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/accessible resources" rel="tag">accessible resources</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/google" rel="tag">google</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/google economy" rel="tag">google economy</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/information" rel="tag">information</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/integration" rel="tag">integration</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/kudos" rel="tag">kudos</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/leading the way" rel="tag">leading the way</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/libraries" rel="tag">libraries</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/library" rel="tag">library</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/open access" rel="tag">open access</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/search" rel="tag">search</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/trustworthy" rel="tag">trustworthy</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/wikipedia" rel="tag">wikipedia</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10615/the-google-economy-vs-libraries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>