Can the Feds take your laptop? Yep. Be prepared to give up your civil rights and your laptop at the border, says a recent article in the Washington Post. This came to the attention of music fans earlier, when MTV news reported that a hard drive seized at the border contained studio recordings for Chris Walla’s (guitarist for Death Cab For Cutie) latest album. There was some suggestion that it was all a publicity stunt, but the Post story suggests that it’s a real and not uncommon problem.

What’s sadder than people in Burundi earning an average of only $90 a year? It might be Bill Gates‘ criticism of MIT’s efforts to bring affordable, networked computers to the poorest countries of the world in hopes of improving education (and communication and healthcare and more).

The challenge is enormous: the technology needs to be durable, require low-power (and be easily rechargeable), as easy to use as an egg timer, have networking in a land without infrastructure, and be cheap, cheap, cheap. Yet somehow, the MIT folks have figured it out, and the project — known to most of us as the $100 laptop project — seems to be on its way to success.

It’s the sort of thing that you’d figure a philanthropic guy like Bill Gates would be on top of. But alas, he seems not to understand. Gizmodo, ArsTechnica, TeleRead, and others are all reporting the world’s richest man went critical over the MIT project.

What are Big G’s complaints?

• The screen is too small
  Hmmm…it’s the same size as on the $1000 Ultra Mobile PCs that Microsoft’s pushing.

• Doesn’t have broadband
  Um, well, Bill doesn’t work in telecomm, but you’d think he’d know that there ain’t much broadband in Africa or in poor countries anywhere.

• Doesn’t have a hard drive (it uses flash-based storage)
  Apparently he worries that it’ll get filled with MP3s.

• The charger requires cranking
  It’s just a generalization, but people usually turn the lights on at night if they can, but there aren’t many in Africa or in poor countries anywhere. Maybe Bill has a line on power fairies?

• Ongoing support, maintenance, and network access costs are far more expensive than the hardware
  Right. So, Bill has first hand experience with the hidden costs of Windows, no?

I’m not sure what Bill thinks should be done instead, and I’m kinda thinking that his remarks will be recorded in history as being about as stunningly stupid as the old “who needs more than 640K” line. Ars Technica’s Nate Anderson was as dumbfounded as the rest of us:

It’s hard to see how a philanthropist could not love a device designed to put basic computing power in the hands of every child on earth, but Gates reached deep down inside and found a way

Perhaps what Bill really wanted to complain about was that the $100 laptops don’t run Windows and that Microsoft hadn’t figured out how to profit off of them yet.

0 computer, 0 laptop, bill gates, billg, harsh, harsh words, microsoft, mit laptop, mobile computing, origami, umpc

Jacqui Cheng likes her new MacBook Pro and loves the performance, but gives the MagSafe power adapter mixed reviews. Why? She says it disconnects when it shouldn’t, and seems to stay connected when it should disconnect.

Well, I think I still want one.

Apple, Jacqui Cheng, laptop, MacBook, MacBook Pro, MacBook Pro reviewed, portable, PowerBook, review

I’ve been doing a lot of talking about the coming information age and how it depends on access technology that is as cheap and easy to use as our cell phones (and applications of it that are as appealing as people find their cell phones). But I’ve been slow to mention the MIT Media Lab’s One Laptop Per Child $100 laptop plan.

The truth is that I just don’t know that much about it. That’s why I was interested to find Andy Carvin’s video interview with Mary Lou Jepsen, the CTO of the project. Jepsen answers Carvin’s questions about what’s what and how it works. I was especially intrigued by how the screen works (it’s brighter because there are no color filters).

$100 laptop, mit, media lab, mit media lab, Mary Lou Jepsen, technology, hardware, laptop, information age, digital divide, ubiquitous computing, ubicomp, portable, portable computing

David Rothman pointed me to Michael Lasky’s PC World review of the Pepper Pad. Lasky bangs on Pepper, saying he can’t recommend it.

Too often, I think, technology reviewers approach a new product without understanding it. Lasky tells us how the Pepper performs when playing music or videos before comparing it to “notebook computers available for the same or a lower price.” We wouldn’t let an automotive reviewer conclude a review of a Prius hybrid to a Chevy truck by saying the truck is the better deal because it has a bigger engine for the same money, so why let technology reviewers off so easy?

Lasky and others need to remember that Americans with mobile phones outnumber Americans with home internet access almost two to one. Clearly, PCs are missing the point, and I’m pretty certain price isn’t the issue. I’ve known too many people who’ve decided their PCs are too spyware, malware, and bloatware infested… too troublesome to continue using.

The Pepper Pad (and the Nokia 770, I like them both) may be able to open that market of more than 80 million Americans who find their cellphone an essential part of their lives, but don’t have the same feelings for Internet access.

tags: access, cluetrain, doesn’t get it, internet access, laptop, michael lasky, notebook computers, palmtop, pc world review, pcworld, pepper, pepper pad, pepper pad review, portable, portable computer, portable computing, post pc, post-pc, review, ultraportable

The most amazing thing about the Pepper Pad is how easy it is to pick up and use, how easy it is to walk around with, and how it’s available when you want it and gone when you don’t.

The Pepper Pad’s portability goes far beyond that of laptops. I mentioned previously that laptops move from desk to desk and Bill Gates tells us how poorly laptops work in elevators. Unlike laptops, the Pepper Pad takes a number of cues from from some of the most successful (and profitable) portable computing devices to come before it: the Game Boy and Playstation Portable. It’s no toy, but like those devices, the Pepper Pad works better in your hands than on a table — though the folding stand will keep it upright if you do put it down.

The split QWERTY keyboard on the left and right of the screen are among the Pepper Pad’s most distinctive features, but its positioning is a genius stroke. It neatly sidesteps the annoyances of handwriting recognition, and its position allows it to be easily ‘thumbed’ while standing or from in your lap. Small keyboards look awkward, but they seem to be catching on, especially on smartphones. I found the little keyboard easy to master during my time with it. As easy as it was to find the keys, though, I have to agree with Zach’s request for more tactile feedback on the keypress.

These features are important because the use I have in mind requires a device that can be used without occupying the user’s full attention. Pepper’s Jon Melamut wants the Pepper Pad to be part of our lives, but not the object of our lives. He’s betting people will start thinking of web access like they do phones and TV remote controls — it’s best to have it in every room of the house.

Cell phones, in fact, may be a good model for Pepper. People don’t want phones, they want connectivity. Phone sales, unlike PC sales, are never based on the amount of RAM or CPU speed, and the phone’s operating system is rarely a factor. The Pepper Pad is designed for a post-PC world where a device’s ability to interact with various networks (web browsing, music streaming, instant messaging, VoIP (coming soon), etc) is more important than the details of the hardware or OS.

That said, it’s a good package. It’s got a bright 8.4 inch (800 x 600) touch screen, some good connectivity features (WiFi, Bluetooth, infrared, USB, audio in and out, composite video out, and a SD/MMC card slot), and the guts (624 Mhz CPU, 20GB HD, stereo speakers) and software (Linux, Mozilla, and a lot of Pepper-specific apps) that make it work all add up to a pretty attractive little device that weighs a little less than the latest Harry Potter (2.3 lbs). At 12.1“ x 6.6” x 0.8“ it’s large enough to be useful, but small enough to be unobtrusive and convenient.

Related: Zach blogged his reaction to the Pepper Pad over at NoSheep.net after our visit a week ago. Roger Sperberg has been writing about some related issues over at TeleRead.org, including this smart post about a computer you can use standing up. Also at TeleRead, David Rothman published some of my early reaction in a July 27th post. I wrote earlier about how I’d like to use the Pepper Pad in my library, and I’m interested in portable computing devices in general.

tags: game boy, laptop, laptops, obidos, pepper, pepper pad, playstation portable, portable computer, portable computing, post pc, post-pc, qwerty, ultraportable, web pad

Libraries are known for books. And despite the constant march of technology, despite the fact that we can put a bazillion songs in our pocket, despite the availability of the New York Times and so many other newspapers and thousands of journals online, books are a big part of what libraries are. Books, dead tree books with that rotting paper smell. And though I dare not prognosticate, I expect they’ll be an emblematic feature of libraries for a while now.

Problem is, books are increasingly anachronistic to young patrons who’ve grown up with the wonders of Google and full text searching.

Find a patron who can explain whatever call number system is in use at your library. Find a patron who can locate a book as fast as they can find movie times in any random city.

That’s why I was anxious to speak with Pepper Computer’s Jon Melamut last week. The Pepper Pad (pictured left) is a delightful, but hard to define post-PC device. Take a look at the specs or my hardware review (coming soon) to learn more.

What’s so special about the Pepper Pad? It’s portable, more portable than a laptop. Laptops move from desk to desk, but patrons often leave them behind when they go looking for books or other materials. See it? Books and computers — even laptops — don’t mix. In this age of computers, PDAs, and iPods, a pen and notepad are still one among our best information tools. The Pepper Pad is small enough, light enough to go with the patron among the stacks, around reference, even (god forbid) into the bathroom.

It’s portable, but it has a big bright screen (8.4“ diagonally) that makes web pages (displayed in Mozilla) and other text easy to read. Your library catalog will look great on it, and any maps or location guides will make a lot more sense when patrons can view them in-situ. It will help them find the books they’re looking for, then offer them a lot more once they do. They should be able to use it to mark the book as useful, or not. And if they stumble across something they didn’t expect, they should be able to mark that too — or look up bibliographic details to help decide what to do with it. Got search-inside-the-book going? How better to use it than on a Pepper Pad from within the stacks?

The portability, the touchscreen, and the stand that keeps it upright and available at all times could make it an ideal research companion. Of course, the built in web radio and AIM client help too. Better, it could enable new applications, new modes of accessing library resources that current technology hasn’t yet revealed.

No matter how small laptops get, they’ll still be deskbound. Tablet PCs change that, but they’re expensive and depend on touchy handwriting recognition. Libraries need inexpensive, useful devices like the Pepper Pad. Libraries are rethinking the OPAC, but the way we access the OPAC must change too.

tags: handheld, handheld computer, laptop, laptop computer, libraries, library, library catalog, library catalogs, opac, pepper, pepper computer, pepper pad, ultra portable