<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MaisonBisson.com &#187; instant messenger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/tag/instant-messenger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maisonbisson.com</link>
	<description>A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Email Is For Old People</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10954/teens-lead/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10954/teens-lead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol instant messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short message service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the death of email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I happened to stumble back onto the Pew Internet Report on teens and technology from July 2005 that report that told us “87% of [US children] between the ages of 12 and 17 are online.” But the part I&#8217;d missed before regarded how these teens were using communication technology:
Email, once the cutting edge “killer app,” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-10954"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p>I happened to stumble back onto the <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/162/report_display.asp" title="Pew Internet &#038; American Life Project Report: Pew Internet: Teens and Technology">Pew Internet Report on teens and technology</a> from July 2005 that report that told us “87% of [US children] between the ages of 12 and 17 are online.” But the part I&#8217;d missed before regarded how these teens were using communication technology:</p>
<blockquote><p>Email, once the cutting edge “killer app,” is losing its privileged place among many teens as they express preferences for instant messaging (IM) and text messaging [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_message_service">SMS</a>] as ways to connect with their friends. </p>
<p>To them, email is increasingly seen as a tool for communicating with “adults” such as teachers, institutions like schools, and as a way to convey lengthy and detailed information to large groups. Meanwhile, IM is used for everyday conversations with multiple friends that range from casual to more serious and private exchanges. </p>
<p>It is also used as a place of personal expression. Through buddy icons or other customization of the look and feel of IM communications, teens can express and differentiate themselves. Other instant messaging tools allow for the posting of personal profiles, or even “away” messages, durable signals posted when a user is away from the computer but wishes to remain connected to their IM network.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting. Connect that with a 2004 <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10321/">Korean study of student&#8217;s communication practices</a> that revealed more than two-thirds of the 2,000 respondents “rarely use or don’t use e-mail at all.” Why?</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;it’s impossible to tell whether an addressee has received a message right away and replies are not immediately forthcoming. [...] “The new generation hate agonizing and waiting and tend to express their feelings immediately,” said Professor Lee. “The decline of email is a natural outcome reflecting such characteristics of the new generation.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting. American teens say email is for old people, Korean high-school and college students say it&#8217;s too slow, and <a href="http://www.unh.edu/">UNH</a>&#8217;s students tells us they chat away <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11152/">an average of 9.3 hours a week in AIM</a>.</p>
<p><tags>aim, aol instant messenger, communication, im, instant messaging, instant messenger, short message service, sms, technology, teens, the death of email, youth</tags></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10954/teens-lead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Connected Students</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11152/struggle-2/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11152/struggle-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Libraries & Networked Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campus computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instant messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of new hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usage survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=11152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just when you thought I was done talking about how <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11100/">the internet really does touch everything</a>, <a href="http://www.remainingrelevant.net/">Lichen</a> posts some details from the most recent University of New Hampshire <a href="http://www.remainingrelevant.net/remaining/93">Res Life student survey</a> and it gets me going again. In order, the top three activities are:

<ul><li>socializing (15.8 hours/week)<br /> </li><li>studying, excluding in-class time (12.5 hours/week)<br /> </li><li>instant messaging, (9.3 hours/week)</li></ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-11152"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p>Just when you thought I was done talking about how <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11100/">the internet really does touch everything</a>, <a href="http://www.remainingrelevant.net/">Lichen</a> posts some details from the most recent University of New Hampshire <a href="http://www.remainingrelevant.net/remaining/93">Res Life student survey</a> and it gets me going again. In order, the top three activities are:</p>
<ul>
<li>socializing (15.8 hours/week)<br /> </li>
<li>studying, excluding in-class time (12.5 hours/week)<br /> </li>
<li>instant messaging, (9.3 hours/week)</li>
</ul>
<p>Lichen also points out that IM activity was reported separately from “personal internet use,” which got an additional 8.4 hours/week.</p>
<p>The survey doesn&#8217;t appear to be online, so I can&#8217;t tell how many other computer-related activities are reported or how activities like “studying” may (or may not) also include computer use.</p>
<p><tags>AIM, campus computing, computer use, IM, instant messenger, online activity, social networking, social software, student life, survey, unh, university of new hampshire, usage survey</tags></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11152/struggle-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>