<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MaisonBisson.com &#187; digital camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/tag/digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maisonbisson.com</link>
	<description>A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Adventure Cameras: Olympus vs. Panasonic</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/13575/adventure-cameras-olympus-vs-panasonic/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/13575/adventure-cameras-olympus-vs-panasonic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adventure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lumix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus Stylus Tough-8000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stylus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underwater camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterproof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/?p=13575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

I&#8217;ve been keeping my eye on the Olympus Stylus Tough-8000. It&#8217;s reportedly durable and waterproof to 33 feet. But I&#8217;ve just discovered the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1, also supposedly tough and waterproof (though only to 10 feet). The Panasonic, however, can shoot HD video and has a higher maximum ISO. The Panasonic also does some funky [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-13575"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p><a title="Adventure Cameras: Olympus vs. Panasonic by misterbisson, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/maisonbisson/3396526145/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3612/3396526145_b0efd74dd9_o.jpg" alt="Adventure Cameras: Olympus vs. Panasonic" width="600" height="207" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been keeping my eye on the <a title="Amazon.com: Olympus Stylus Tough-8000 12 MP Digital Camera with 3.6x Wide Angle Optical Dual Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD (Black): Electronics" href="http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-8000-Stabilized-Black/dp/B001P06Q5C/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=electronics&amp;qid=1238373639&amp;sr=8-1">Olympus Stylus Tough-8000</a>. It&#8217;s reportedly durable and waterproof to 33 feet. But I&#8217;ve just discovered the <a title="Amazon.com: Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 12MP Digital Camera with 4.6x Wide Angle MEGA Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7 inch LCD (Orange): Camera &amp; Photo" href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-TS1-Digital-Stabilized-Orange/dp/B001QFZMB0">Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1</a>, also supposedly tough and waterproof (though only to 10 feet). The Panasonic, however, can shoot HD video and has a higher maximum ISO. The Panasonic also does some funky facial recognition (which favors recognized faces when focusing), but the Olympus can stitch multiple-shot panoramas in the camera and has “tap control” that allows, well, it appears to allow you to control the camera&#8217;s settings by tapping the sides rather than fiddling with buttons.</p>
<p>This reviewer <a title="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS1 hands-on with image samples - infoSync World" href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/10084.html">seems to think the Panasonic bests Olympus&#8217; offering</a>. The Olympus is available now, however, and <a title="Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: Olympus Stylus Tough-8000 12 MP Digital Camera with 3.6x Wide Angle Optical Dual Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD (Black)" href="http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-Stylus-Tough-8000-Stabilized-Black/product-reviews/B001P06Q5C/ref=cm_cr_dp_all_helpful?ie=UTF8&amp;coliid=&amp;showViewpoints=1&amp;colid=&amp;sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending">users seem to think it a good one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/13575/adventure-cameras-olympus-vs-panasonic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distracted By My Shiny New Camera</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10854/distracted-by-my-shiny-new-camera-2/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10854/distracted-by-my-shiny-new-camera-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giddiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new gadget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c4000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c8080]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The Olympus C8080, one of the best digital cameras ever, can be had for under $500, refurbished, from some sellers on Amazon. That&#8217;s about where the price/features ratio against the C7000 I was excited about last week tips strongly in favor of the C8080.
I might get into why I&#8217;m not excited about dSLRs in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-10854"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0001DKLHS/maisonbisso-20/"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0001DKLHS.01.PT01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg" width="500" height="414" style="border: solid 0px #000000; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;" /></a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0001DKLHS/maisonbisso-20/">Olympus C8080</a>, one of the best digital cameras ever, can be had for under $500, refurbished, from some sellers on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0001DKLHS/maisonbisso-20/">Amazon</a>. That&#8217;s about where the price/features ratio against the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0002ZUHB0/maisonbisso-20/">C7000</a> I was excited about <a href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10849/">last week</a> tips strongly in favor of the C8080.</p>
<p>I might get into why I&#8217;m not excited about dSLRs in a later post, but I won&#8217;t deny that price is part of it. Still, I think even the most die-hard dSLR aficionado will agree the C8080 has <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/C8080/C88A12.HTM">a lot to love</a>.</p>
<p>The question remains: will it replace the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006F2MW/maisonbisso-20/">Olympus C4000</a> I&#8217;ve become so comfortable with? I think so.<br />
<!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/digital camera" rel="tag">digital camera</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/giddiness" rel="tag">giddiness</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/new camera" rel="tag">new camera</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/new gadget" rel="tag">new gadget</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/new gadgets" rel="tag">new gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus c4000" rel="tag">olympus c4000</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus c7000" rel="tag">olympus c7000</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus c8080" rel="tag">olympus c8080</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus camera" rel="tag">olympus camera</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10854/distracted-by-my-shiny-new-camera-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distracted By My Shiny New Camera</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10849/distracted-by-my-shiny-new-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10849/distracted-by-my-shiny-new-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 07:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Bisson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photoblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giddiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c4000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus c8080]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steves digicams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

My Olympus C4000 is hard to beat. Steve&#8217;s Digicams reviewed it well, and many friends with newer cameras find features or capabilities in it they miss on theirs. So, despite my schoolboy giddiness at the arrival of new gadgets, I&#8217;m waiting to be convinced that my new C7000 will replace it. It too was well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<abbr class="unapi-id" title="maisonbisson-10849"><!-- &nbsp; --></abbr>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0002ZUHB0/maisonbisso-20/"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0002ZUHB0.01.PT01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg" width="500" height="313" style="border: solid 0px #000000; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0px; padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;" /></a></p>
<p>My <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006F2MW/maisonbisso-20/">Olympus C4000</a> is hard to beat. <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2002_reviews/c4000.html">Steve&#8217;s Digicams</a> reviewed it well, and many friends with newer cameras find features or capabilities in it they miss on theirs. So, despite my schoolboy giddiness at the arrival of new gadgets, I&#8217;m waiting to be convinced that my new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0002ZUHB0/maisonbisson-20/">C7000</a> will replace it. It too was <a href="http://www.steves-digicams.com/2004_reviews/c7000.html">well reviewed</a>, and already I can see that it addresses some of my few complaints about the C4000, but transitions like this take time.</p>
<p>&#8230;And, I might still be in love with the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0001DKLHS/maisonbisso-20/">Olympus C8080</a>. The 8080 has a very wide lens with a lot of glass up front. It was the camera Olympus made when they weren&#8217;t worried about making room for DSLRs, so it has a lot of pro features.<br />
<!-- technorati tags start -->
<p style="text-align:right;font-size:10px;">tags: <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/digital camera" rel="tag">digital camera</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/giddiness" rel="tag">giddiness</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/new camera" rel="tag">new camera</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/new gadgets" rel="tag">new gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus c4000" rel="tag">olympus c4000</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus c7000" rel="tag">olympus c7000</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus c8080" rel="tag">olympus c8080</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/olympus camera" rel="tag">olympus camera</a>, <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/steves digicams" rel="tag">steves digicams</a></p>
<p><!-- technorati tags end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10849/distracted-by-my-shiny-new-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>