http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/wpopac-reloaded/ A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about. Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:08:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/wpopac-reloaded/#comment-68225 Some quickies for Aug 22 2006 at ebyblog Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:28:47 +0000 http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/#comment-68225 [...] Casey discusses how easy it is to tweak the catalog once you have a backend that’s a bit more robust. [...] [...] Casey discusses how easy it is to tweak the catalog once you have a backend that’s a bit more robust. [...]

]]> http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/wpopac-reloaded/#comment-68132 Scott Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:40:07 +0000 http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/#comment-68132 Hmmm... shouldn't everything be "sortable" that makes sense to sort? Author, Subject, Title, Copyright Date, whatever. Well, maybe not Publisher... but heck, why not? :-) [tags]Summary Displays, Library Catalogs, Result Screens[/tags] Hmmm… shouldn’t everything be “sortable” that makes sense to sort? Author, Subject, Title, Copyright Date, whatever. Well, maybe not Publisher… but heck, why not?
[tags]Summary Displays, Library Catalogs, Result Screens[/tags]

]]> http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/wpopac-reloaded/#comment-68024 walt crawford Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:53 +0000 http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/#comment-68024 Sigh. Let me refine that. I don't think pagination is needed on the summary display, but it would be nice on the detailed display. (Subject keys on the summary display? I wouldn't go there...) Sigh. Let me refine that. I don’t think pagination is needed on the summary display, but it would be nice on the detailed display. (Subject keys on the summary display? I wouldn’t go there…)

]]> http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/wpopac-reloaded/#comment-68023 walt crawford Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:54:58 +0000 http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11420/#comment-68023 Adding the date and format are good. Adding pagination/extent (MARC field 300, maybe labeled "Physical description") might be good. As you say, people with the right skills could do it themselves. Interesting work. Adding the date and format are good. Adding pagination/extent (MARC field 300, maybe labeled “Physical description”) might be good. As you say, people with the right skills could do it themselves. Interesting work.

]]>