A while ago I reported on the Pew Internet Project’s November 2005 report on increased use of search engines. Here’s what I had to say at the time:
On an average day, about 94 million American adults use the internet; 77% will use email, 63% will use a search engine.
Among all the online activities tracked, including chatting and IMing, reading blogs or news, banking, and buying, not one of them includes searching a library OPAC.
Walt Crawford properly took me to task, noting:
The report that’s downloadable does show that people aren’t being asked an open-ended “what did you do on the Internet today?” question. They’re being asked to respond to a list. If “searching a library OPAC” isn’t on the list, it is absolutely guaranteed not to be in the results.
It’s taken me some time, but I’m finally following up on that point. The question seems to revolve around how the list of activities was generated, and to answer it I contacted project director Lee Rainie. Lee explained that the intent of the project and the surveys is to help us understand how people use the internet and does not consider other activities. Regarding the list of ten online activities in this survey, he noted that it was a list he chose as “an illustrative list, rather than comprehensive list.”
Lee was careful to emphasize the way he values libraries and wanted to be clear that though the Project has tracked 90 online activities in its many surveys, they haven’t yet asked internet users about their use of online library services. I don’t know if it was just because I was asking the questions, or if he’s been thinking about this for some time, but he did suggest that the project might include library-related questions in a future study.
I was putting Lee in a tough spot, as the real question we want him to answer is something along the lines of “did the survey not include questions about online library usage because it’s statistically insignificant or was it an oversight?” Lee is a smart guy, smart enough not to answer that — smart enough to avoid stepping into our internal debates — so the following is based on my continued research into the question, not my conversation with him.
As it turns out, while much of the most interesting data in the November 20 2005 report comes from the project’s phone survey, the report uses data from comScore to support those phone survey results. While Walt is right about the phone survey, the comScore data doesn’t appear subject to those limitations:
The comScore data cited in this report come from comScore Media Metrix, an internet audience measurement service that uses a massive cross-section of more than 1.5 million U.S. consumers who have given comScore explicit permission to confidentially capture their browsing and transaction behavior, including online and offline purchasing.
In a comment to my previous post, KateZ expressed some concern that the comScore data was only tracking top search engines; comScore offers many reports based on their usage tracking, the qSearch report is a keyword optimization tool and doesn’t reflect the full breadth of data harvested by the company. It doesn’t answer the question on its own, but can we not assume that a company that makes is business by tracking the every online activity of its research subjects would investigate any library-related activity if such activity was significant enough to reveal trends in consumer interest or behavior?
Elsewhere, in the PIP’s August 11 2004 report on The Internet and Daily Life, we find some detailed insights on how those phone survey questions are selected:
To assemble a good list of activities, we followed insights gained from previous research and divided online activities into four categories: information seeking; communications; transactions; and entertainment. We chose several examples for each category. These examples are not meant to cover all kinds of activities, but rather to represent everyday tasks and typical recreations that Americans enjoy. We chose activities that would broadly represent what the Internet has to offer, that would resonate with a broad audience, and that would tap into our understanding of the Internet use gained from our past research. Recognizing, of course, our choice of particular activities might influence the findings, we tried to observe the specific but then draw generalizations from our observations.
And in the November 2 2005 report on Teen Content Creators and Consumers, we learn that the project uses focus groups and small surveys with open ended questions to help shape their research and larger surveys. In that case:
Four focus groups were also conducted with a total of 38 high school and middle school students.
…teens took an online survey of multiple choice, open-ended and short-answer-style questions…
Full details on page 25 of the PDF.
So, I can’t really offer the answers we all want, but my gut feeling is that if library usage was a statistically significant activity for American internet users, the Pew Internet folks would have picked up on it and asked more detailed questions.
Sadly, I’ve been so slow to followup on all this that it may not matter anymore. OCLC released their Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources report in early December. The report revealed that patrons are generally happier using search engines than their libraries when asked to rate both in terms of volume, quality, speed, and overall experience.
This is scary to some, but good news to the libraries that are willing to take advantage of it. It means the tools, the access, and the information literacy are all coming together for our patrons. Now it’s just up to us to participate.
I’ll be talking about this in my ALA Midwinter presentation, see you in San Antonio.
search engines, library, libraries, library usage, online library, online libraries, online activities, pew internet project, pew internet and american life project, internet, internet usage, online behavior, lib20, library20, library 2.0, library evolution, search engine, search engine use, web searching
Related:
Posted January 8, 2006 by Casey
Categories: Libraries & Networked Information. Tags: internet, internet usage, lib20, libraries, library, library 2.0, library evolution, library usage, library20, online activities, online behavior, online libraries, online library, pew internet and american life project, pew internet project, search engine, search engine use, search engines, web searching.
No Comments
No comments yet.
Comments RSS
TrackBack Identifier URI
Leave a comment
User contributed tags for this post:
library vs internet (49) - library versus internet (22) - internet vs library (21) - Library vs search engines (10) - libraries vs search engines (9) - internet usage vs library use survey (9) - Internet versus library (7) - internet vs library debate (6) - library vs internet research (5) - Libraries vs Internet (5) - Library Vs Search Engine (5) - Library vs Online search (4) - search a debate (4) - libraries v internet (4) - online research versus traditional library (4) - Libraries versus Internet (4) - online library versus ground library (4) - online research versus library research (4) - online research vs library (4) - library vs internet questionnaire (3) - search engines debate (3) - online library vs on-ground library (3) - search engine vs library (3) - research online vs library (3) - internet vs library questionnaire (3) - google versus library (3) - searching 1 questionnaire (3) - internet vs and library vs research (3) - online versus on ground library (3) - library versus internet use (3) - Google vs library (3) - online research vs traditional library research (3) - Online research vs traditional library (3) - Library vs Google (3) - internet (3) - questionair about internet (2) - Online Libraries vs libraries (2) - library versus internet research (2) - advantages of researching internet versus library (2) - online research versus in the library (2) - search vs research (2) - Internet vs book (2) - traditional library vs online library (2) - internet vs library research (2) - online research versus going to a library (2) - online search vs library (2) - Study in Internet vs Library (2) - internet vs books (2) - internet versus library research survey (2) - online research versus library (2) - Americans internet search vs library (2) - online library v ground library (2) - internet use compared to library (2) - survey questions web usage for online research (2) - trends in library usage (2) - library vs (2) - library vs internet searches (2) - google internet usage questionnaire (2) - Multiple Choice Questions of Search engine (2) - debate library versus internet (2) - research vs search (2) - library versus the internet (2) - library vs the internet (2) - usage of internet vs usage of library(Questionnaire) (2) - online search versus library (2) - online research vs library research (2) - sex farmer com sex search engine (2) - survey questionnaire about internet vs library (2) - library use vs internet use (2) - library versus internet google (2) - search engine vs libraries (2) - Library versus the Internet debate (2) - online library versus on ground library (2) - search engine vs library searching (2) - Library Search Vs Internet Search (2) - opac versus (2) - Library Use versus Internet Use (2) - internet versus library usage (2) - online search vs library search (2) - library vs internet surveys (2) - consumer goes to library vs using internet for research (2) - online libraries vs ground libraries (2) - internet searching vs library (2) - library usage vs internet searching (2) - debate search engines (2) - search engine usage versus library usage (2) - internet usage library usage public libraries (2) - internet vs library as research tool (2) - debate search (2) - online questionnaire on search engines (2) - search engine versus the library (2) - search engine survey questionnaire (2) - library online vs search engine (2) - library versus online research (2) - online library vs ground library (2) - online research versus library research results (2) - search engine versus library (2) - library usage vs internet usage (2) - online behavior tracking comscore (2) - walt lishost org (2) - opac (2) - library searching Internet searching (2) - walt crawford library 2 0 (2) - oclc research (2) - online library verus on ground library (2) - to investigate library versus search engine (1) - search tool library vs online (1) - library online search versus traditional library (1) - interntet based research vs lirary research (1) - Book Vs Internet Debate (1) - questionnaire on t v vs internet (1) - advantages of an on-line library versus an on ground li (1) - library questionnaires (1) - traditional versus online libraries (1) - internet vs book statistic (1) - libraries vs the internet (1) - ON LINE LIBRARY VS TRADITIONAL LIBRARY (1) - online vs traditional library searches (1) - books versus search engines (1) - internet results vs. library research (1) - pew library usage (1) - advantage library versus the internet (1) - search engine traditional OR classic library (1) - online library versus goround librrary (1) - internet usage vs library (1) - traditional versus online libraies (1) - online librarys vs on ground librarys (1) - Questionnaire on searching information in the internet (1) - library reference transactions vs google searches (1) - library versus web search (1) - google vs library research (1) - open ended questions for cell phone debate (1) - a library compared to the internet (1) - library research versus online research (1) - questionnaire for internet users searching (1) - high school library search engines (1) - questionair libraries (1) - ??? tap (1) - internet use vs library use (1) - Library research vs the Internet (1) - search engine vs internet usage (1) - debate books online vs books (1) - reasearch online vs reasearch in library (1) - searcing information online compared to traditional library (1) - library online research versus book research (1) - on-ground libraries (1) - library usage trends (1) - comparison of time to search on internet vs time to res (1) - Six Weapons of Influence questionnaire (1) - internet versus the library (1) -
