<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CMS Pitfalls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10985/cms-pitfalls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10985/cms-pitfalls/</link>
	<description>A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:08:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10985/cms-pitfalls/comment-page-1/#comment-18040</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10985#comment-18040</guid>
		<description>casey, i may have disappeared, but even in the weird ghost world in which i live i still check your blog.  this is right on the money.  i&#039;ve been making a cms for an online poetry journal and the one thing that keeps occuring to me is that it&#039;s all about easy content management and only for exactly what you need.  i looked at other opensource systems &amp; noticed the a couple of the commercial products, but they all seem to suck in one way or another &amp; would be more trouble to adapt than doing it myself.  well, all i&#039;m doing in agreeing, but it&#039;s just nice to see that some people are thinking the same things as me.

take care</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>casey, i may have disappeared, but even in the weird ghost world in which i live i still check your blog.  this is right on the money.  i&#8217;ve been making a cms for an online poetry journal and the one thing that keeps occuring to me is that it&#8217;s all about easy content management and only for exactly what you need.  i looked at other opensource systems &amp; noticed the a couple of the commercial products, but they all seem to suck in one way or another &amp; would be more trouble to adapt than doing it myself.  well, all i&#8217;m doing in agreeing, but it&#8217;s just nice to see that some people are thinking the same things as me.</p>
<p>take care</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>