<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OCLC Report: Libraries vs. Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10979/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10979/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines</link>
	<description>A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: élet és könyvtár &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Könyvtáros vs. Gúgli</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10979/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines#comment-103225</link>
		<dc:creator>élet és könyvtár &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Könyvtáros vs. Gúgli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10979#comment-103225</guid>
		<description>[...] Ã‰rdekes grafikon a Maisonbisson-blogon: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ã‰rdekes grafikon a Maisonbisson-blogon: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Think You Use Web 2.0? Think Again &#171; MaisonBisson.com</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10979/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines#comment-34803</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Think You Use Web 2.0? Think Again &#171; MaisonBisson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 04:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10979#comment-34803</guid>
		<description>[...] That&#8217;s why Zeldman and Calore are publishing no end of tips on how to get better search engine placement, how to design usable and accessible sites, and how to design them well. Look back at O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Web 2.0 spiel. Right there near the top you&#8217;ll see him talk about how â€œthe web is a platformâ€ and a discussion of why Google is the â€œstandard bearerâ€ for Web 2.0. Google&#8217;s success has nothing to do with AJAX, and it&#8217;s not tags. Google&#8217;s success is in the way it delivers, for the most part, what people want when they want it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That&#8217;s why Zeldman and Calore are publishing no end of tips on how to get better search engine placement, how to design usable and accessible sites, and how to design them well. Look back at O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s Web 2.0 spiel. Right there near the top you&#8217;ll see him talk about how â€œthe web is a platformâ€ and a discussion of why Google is the â€œstandard bearerâ€ for Web 2.0. Google&#8217;s success has nothing to do with AJAX, and it&#8217;s not tags. Google&#8217;s success is in the way it delivers, for the most part, what people want when they want it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Library vs. Search Engine Debate, Redux &#171; MaisonBisson.com</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10979/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines#comment-26260</link>
		<dc:creator>The Library vs. Search Engine Debate, Redux &#171; MaisonBisson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10979#comment-26260</guid>
		<description>[...] Sadly, I&#8217;ve been so slow to followup on all this that it may not matter anymore. OCLC released their Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources report in early December. The report revealed that patrons are generally happier using search engines than their libraries when asked to rate both in terms of volume, quality, speed, and overall experience. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sadly, I&#8217;ve been so slow to followup on all this that it may not matter anymore. OCLC released their Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources report in early December. The report revealed that patrons are generally happier using search engines than their libraries when asked to rate both in terms of volume, quality, speed, and overall experience. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bathroom Reader &#171; MaisonBisson.com</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10979/oclc-report-libraries-vs-search-engines#comment-20320</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bathroom Reader &#171; MaisonBisson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10979#comment-20320</guid>
		<description>[...] I apparently have too many neatnik issues to go down that path, but rather than devolve the discussion, I&#8217;d like to point out that this Center for the Digital Future report appears to be a good complement to OCLC&#8217;s latest report and the regular stream of reports from the Pew Internet Project. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I apparently have too many neatnik issues to go down that path, but rather than devolve the discussion, I&#8217;d like to point out that this Center for the Digital Future report appears to be a good complement to OCLC&#8217;s latest report and the regular stream of reports from the Pew Internet Project. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
