<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attack Of The Blogs (Yeah)!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10933/attack-of-the-blogs-yeah/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10933/attack-of-the-blogs-yeah/</link>
	<description>A bunch of stuff I would have emailed you about.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: To Blog Or Not To Blog &#171; MaisonBisson.com</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10933/attack-of-the-blogs-yeah/#comment-30759</link>
		<dc:creator>To Blog Or Not To Blog &#171; MaisonBisson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10933#comment-30759</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve all heard stories of bloggers who&#8217;ve lost jobs as a result of the content of their posts. And if you believe the Forbes story, the blogosphere is filled with teaming hordes intent on ruining established companies and destroying the economy (okay, I exaggerate). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;ve all heard stories of bloggers who&#8217;ve lost jobs as a result of the content of their posts. And if you believe the Forbes story, the blogosphere is filled with teaming hordes intent on ruining established companies and destroying the economy (okay, I exaggerate). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggin' Outloud</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10933/attack-of-the-blogs-yeah/#comment-20874</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggin' Outloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10933#comment-20874</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Real Content: Forbes Repents&lt;/strong&gt;

Okay, okay. Enough search string silliness and headline humor. No more National Spotlights on Kansas News. (Who cares about Kansas anyway?) You've had it with caption contests and Don Surber references. You want content! And you won't be content with...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Real Content: Forbes Repents</strong></p>
<p>Okay, okay. Enough search string silliness and headline humor. No more National Spotlights on Kansas News. (Who cares about Kansas anyway?) You&#8217;ve had it with caption contests and Don Surber references. You want content! And you won&#8217;t be content with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who&#8217;s Afraid Of Wikipedia? &#171; MaisonBisson.com</title>
		<link>http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/10933/attack-of-the-blogs-yeah/#comment-19173</link>
		<dc:creator>Who&#8217;s Afraid Of Wikipedia? &#171; MaisonBisson.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maisonbisson.com/blog/?p=10933#comment-19173</guid>
		<description>[...] It all sounds the same as the Attack of the Blogs story in November issue of Forbes Magazine. That story began ominously: Web logs are the prized platform of an online lynch mob spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective. Their potent allies in this pursuit include Google and Yahoo. But Forbes and Seigenthaler both conveniently ignore the fact that lies, libel and invective are common in other, older media. And Seigenthaler should know well the limitations of editorial authority over the millions of words published by hundreds of writers in a newspaper every day. Mistakes are made, and yes, counterfactual material is often slipped in. (Sadly, it&#8217;s also worth noting that real lynch mobs of the post-reconstruction South often enjoyed the support of their local newspapers.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It all sounds the same as the Attack of the Blogs story in November issue of Forbes Magazine. That story began ominously: Web logs are the prized platform of an online lynch mob spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective. Their potent allies in this pursuit include Google and Yahoo. But Forbes and Seigenthaler both conveniently ignore the fact that lies, libel and invective are common in other, older media. And Seigenthaler should know well the limitations of editorial authority over the millions of words published by hundreds of writers in a newspaper every day. Mistakes are made, and yes, counterfactual material is often slipped in. (Sadly, it&#8217;s also worth noting that real lynch mobs of the post-reconstruction South often enjoyed the support of their local newspapers.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>