The deeds they do so now they raise
Against others in allegation;
But what makes slander, tell me please,
What constitutes? Deliberation
Upon the matter may reveal
But more false propaganda´s zeal.

So too, those as disseminate
Revisions over deeds historic,
Now claim it is their foes create
Much obfuscation, and euphoric
Subvert criteria objective
Of which tradition was selective.

It is “Assault on Reason” truly,
As everyone becomes unruly.

2A.) The slogan, “Fair and Balanced” illustrates FNC’s emphasis on presenting all sides of an issue. The movie and the website have no similar slogan or ideal as a goal.

2B.) Name a member of the FNC staff who has criticized the channel for having a bias. I highly doubt such a thing exists.

2C.) It’s hypocritical to criticize me for expressing my viewpoint using Al Franken and Eric Alterman. They only criticize my expression because it’s not far left. Should my expression have been liberal it would have been (very much like their own) and completely acceptable. They wouldn’t argue there’s anything wrong with criticism, because if there was, they’d both be unemployed.

*** I’ll finish the rest of my response when I’ve got the disposable time. ***

1B.) You’ve referred to my comments as unfair. How are they unfair and how are they any different from your responses to them? Are they only unfair because they dissent from your view point? That’s sure how you make it sound.

1C.) Only conservative groups identify and attack through criticism? What about Michel Moore? What about yourself? Maybe I’m mixed up and only liberals have the right to criticize.

1D.) You’re using sources that are pre-determined to agree with your perspective. This is like asking the manager of McDonald’s about Burger King hamburgers – it’s biased and proves nothing.

1E.) Which “Personal attacks” were these? I’ve never attacked you personally, only your far left ideology. What’s unfair is that you’ve resorted to ad hominem attacks rather then responding to sincere criticism. This is specifically demonstrated in your reference to me as a “brown shirt.”

1F.) How did I re-frame your stories? Nothing was taken out of context – I only commented upon what you wrote. IF that’s re-framing then how are you not guilty of the same in your response?

The media research center has shown statistics on media converage. A hot button issue will be discussed nationally and the network news shows and CNN will give more air time to those who discuss the issue from a liberal point of view. I can’t speak for Fox but I can bet some conservatives saw something like this happening and had the idea of making a news station where both libs and cons get the same air time.

Well, I will admit I cant say for certainty that that happens of Fox. Three or four of the news shows on that channel are hosted by cons. But they seem to try and get an equal number of lib and con guests. The other news blocks either give you the news straight or have a panel of people with mixed views. I know they hired Gretta Van Sustren lately and it would seem they did so in order to add another lib to the evening line up. Cal Thomas is very layed back and does not challenge much of what liberals say on his weeekend show. And I’d like proof that the producers give more air time to Hannity. I watch that show quite a bit and they both seem to get equal amounts of time. I am kinda being the devils advocate for Fox. I realize they may well be doing what they complain CNN does but I’d like more prove before I will cry con bias there. I get my news from a variety of news outlets and have never seen something that the libs view as important left out of Fox’s line up.