Blog Archives

Amanda Nguyen|You have an email regarding Deviation for Taz, If you choose not to change component at U119, please send epage, email to Oscar now. Thanks, Amanda ||163

8:59 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

odiazlan|call Oscar Diaz at 408-242-2275. RE: TAZ deviation. Oscar.

8:31 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

team and currently I don’t know. Please respond immediately. Jim -2/2

8:27 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

jwerle|Amanda: What changes are you making to the deviation? This deviation was supposed to have been finished and sent to CEL by 3:00. This is unsatisfactory performance. I need to know what is going on so I can brief my management -1/2

8:27 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

totake|Jim, I rejected the Deviation per Amanda’s request. She has one more change to the deviation and asked me to reject it. Todd

8:23 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

rejected the deviation, please say so. Jim -2/2

8:15 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

jwerle|Todd: Deviations don’t address field returns, ECOs do. And the ECO will definitely state “fix on failure”. We’re doing this deviation to get production back up, that’s all. If I’m not adequately addressing the reason you -1/2

8:15 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

resubmit. Please check with them so that I get all the details, else they need to write deviation. Oscar. -2/2

7:53 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

odiazlan|Jim: I did not get CLS the instructions right at 3:00 pm but I did send them the RWK instructions. NOTE: I just found out the design engr. according to Amanda wants to add another change. So, I have to cancell deviation and -1/2

7:53 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

Amanda Nguyen|No result for EDVT because Rick has a IOS test problem..not related to U119. Will have result on Wed. Thanks, Amanda ||132

7:37 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

abarkocy|Jim: Deviation D024107 has been sent for internal approval at Cisco – an advanced copy will be sent to Celestica. regards, allen b

7:32 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

jwerle|Did we get written instructions to CEL by 3:00 as I promised? If not, have we communciated that it’s okay to restart production? Did the U119 rework pass EDVT? Please let me know ASAP. Jim

7:28 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

odiazlan|All: Deviation D024107 has been submitted for approval to incorporate U119 wire jumper and HTSK/EMI assembly. Regards, Oscar.

7:26 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

ppesek|Are we still having WANIP Ops Meeting Today? Did not see a cancellation notice go out… Paul Pesek

6:04 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

U66_HSK reworked anyway. Please make the deviation reflect this. Thanks, Jim -2/2

5:26 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

jwerle|Oscar/Allen: Screening of RMAd boards at CEL for adhesive backing WILL NOT BE NECESSARY. U119 rework REQUIRES ICT for every returned board, and U66_HSK must be removed prior to ICT anyway. Thus, all returned boards will have -1/2

5:25 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

odiazlan|Allen: Got your messages, I am currently workin on the deviation. Will advice as soon as I submit for approval. Oscar.

5:23 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

own is taking priority one. I will send updates through E-Mail. regards, allen b x55935

4:28 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

abarkocy|Hello Team: Today’s Meeting for Manufacturing TAZ CR has been cancelled since coordination and support of the current TAZ Line D

4:27 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

nt Basie

1:14 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

klaughli|Can you guys join us in DRT Steering? Cou

1:14 pm September 11, 2001
Leave a comment

ewatko|SJ – I am working from home today – as expected. Regards to your family if you have some related to this tragedy. Please epage or email me for urgent issues. Eric

11:52 am September 11, 2001
Leave a comment